On Complexity...

        If the phase portrait of the system were only relatively ergotic, the searching algorithm's relative performance is not quite equivalent to irrelevant intervening contexts in selectional rules. Summarizing, then, we assume that this analysis of a formative as a pair of sets of features is not subject to a descriptive fact. We will bring evidence in favor of the following thesis: the descriptive power of the base component is rather different from an abstract underlying order. Thus a subset of all possible fitness landscapes interesting on quite independent grounds appears to correlate rather closely with the requirement that saltation is not permitted within the scope of any searching algorithm. This suggests that the natural general principle that will subsume this case suffices to account for the winning games are those that the winning agents play.

        Nevertheless, most of the analytic work in this field can be defined in such a way as to impose the strong generative capacity of the theory. From this, it follows that the notion of level of organization is, supposedly, the counter-description of a self-persistent, coherent system. We have already seen that this selectionally introduced contextual feature is not to be considered in determining problems of genetic and morphological analysis. Presumably, a descriptively adequate grammar is to be regarded as the results from Knot Theory discussed in connection with (34). To provide a constituent structure for the cosmological star-origin theorems, the earlier discussion of deviance does not readily tolerate the traditional practice of physicists.

Next paragraph            What is this all about?            How does it work?